<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: *Note to the Reader (Read First!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psalm45publications.com/patristics/note-to-the-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psalm45publications.com/patristics/note-to-the-reader/</link>
	<description>The Writings of Nathan Pitchford</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:02:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pitchford</title>
		<link>http://psalm45publications.com/patristics/note-to-the-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-10304</link>
		<dc:creator>pitchford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psalm45publications.com/?p=2374#comment-10304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No, I haven&#039;t read McGrath -- I should put him on my list. Are you familiar with Tom Oden&#039;s Justification Reader? In it, he attempts something similar to what I&#039;m hoping to do; but I intend to address a wider array of topics, and provide more quotations with less of my own commentary. I&#039;m hoping to do some more work in Augustine, but what I&#039;ve found so far has been pretty encouraging -- I agree, I&#039;ve already found some evidence of imputation in him. Time is an issue too, it&#039;s a very busy summer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for stopping by!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I haven&#8217;t read McGrath &#8212; I should put him on my list. Are you familiar with Tom Oden&#8217;s Justification Reader? In it, he attempts something similar to what I&#8217;m hoping to do; but I intend to address a wider array of topics, and provide more quotations with less of my own commentary. I&#8217;m hoping to do some more work in Augustine, but what I&#8217;ve found so far has been pretty encouraging &#8212; I agree, I&#8217;ve already found some evidence of imputation in him. Time is an issue too, it&#8217;s a very busy summer.</p>

<p>Thanks for stopping by!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://psalm45publications.com/patristics/note-to-the-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-10303</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psalm45publications.com/?p=2374#comment-10303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good stuff Nate,
Have you read McGrath in Justitia Dei? He does a reasonable job of outlining the progression of the fathers to the Reformers. Although I believe he does not give enough credit to Augustine for an understanding of imputed righteousness. He does, however, firmly credit the Reformers for the bifurcation of justification and sanctification which he argues is the genius of the Reformation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2 Cor. 5:21&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Nate,
Have you read McGrath in Justitia Dei? He does a reasonable job of outlining the progression of the fathers to the Reformers. Although I believe he does not give enough credit to Augustine for an understanding of imputed righteousness. He does, however, firmly credit the Reformers for the bifurcation of justification and sanctification which he argues is the genius of the Reformation.</p>

<p>2 Cor. 5:21</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

